View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kim
Joined: 10 May 2001 Posts: 44 Location: upstate NY
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2001 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would be interested in a discussion of film speed and bellows extension. In general I seem to need about a three stop adjustment to my meter readings from the specified film speed. By this I mean that 3000 asa seems correctly exposed when corrected to a film speed of around 400...now this is for medium
depth focus 8-25 feet.
Does this seem about right?
Kim Hartshorn |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2001 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Something's wrong. Bellows factor doesn't really have a noticable effect until you are a couple of feet away with a normal lens. at 8 to 25 feet, the only way bellows factor plays in is if you have a very very long lens.
I'd check the iris and make sure that it's moving properly, then the shutter. If you can hear a decernable difference from shutter speed to shutter speed that should be okay.
Is the underexposure consistant at different shutter speeds? Try variing the shutter speeds with different apertures.
Just so we are on an even footing, what camera ,lens and meter are you using? Is it possible you are using an old meter, that like me, isnt' as responsive as it's supposed to be?
[ This Message was edited by: Les on 2001-06-16 09:01 ] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hartwell_a_m
Joined: 04 Jun 2001 Posts: 84 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2001 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The bellows factor only aplies when the bellows is extended past the lenth of the lens and is about 1/3 f stop per inch. The bellows factor usualy coms into play at distances under about 3-4 ft in my experiance
though this does depend on the lenth of the lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LelandRay
Joined: 24 May 2001 Posts: 115 Location: Mississippi
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2001 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's a formula for computing exposure increases necessary as bellows length increases:
bellows length2
----------------
lens length2
=exposure factor
Thus, with the bellows extended to 12" and using a 6" lens, the formula would be
122
----
62
or...
144
---
36
equals 4x
So two stops of increase.
[ This Message was edited by: LelandRay on 2001-06-16 14:40 ] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hugo13
Joined: 06 Sep 2001 Posts: 14 Location: Georgia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2001 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Check out Calumet's Bellows Extension Calculator - by far the easiest way to get it right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LelandRay
Joined: 24 May 2001 Posts: 115 Location: Mississippi
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2001 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2001-09-26 17:31, hugo13 wrote:
Check out Calumet's Bellows Extension Calculator - by far the easiest way to get it right.
|
I don't do all that much closeup work, so exposure change with bellows extension isn't a big problem for me, but I don't do math well at all, so a calculator would be a big help. I tried to order a Speed Stick through B&H, but they're out of stock and probably will stay that way. I'll check with Calumet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Henry
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 1644 Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2001 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've shot chromogenic b/w (Ilford, Kodak), also Gold 100 and Ektachrome 64 and 100 on the Century Graphic with 65, 101, and 203 mm Optars, never compensated for bellows factor with any of these film/lens combinations, and exposure for me has been right on---no surprise with the very tolerant chromogenics, and a pleasant surprise on the Ektachromes. Have you tried it both ways to see if there really is a difference? I might add that my main meter for outdoor (sun-lit) subjects is the venerable GE DW-68, and for indoor (dim-light and flash) subjects I rely on the Gossen Luna-Pro F.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LelandRay
Joined: 24 May 2001 Posts: 115 Location: Mississippi
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2001 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't had any occasion to factor in bellows extension, so I just trust my meter, a high tech Sekonic L508. There's no reason to worry about exposure compensation unless you shoot closeup work or for some reason are working with totally unforgiving film. What change would 1/20th of a stop make to Ektachrome? My guess would be that you'd be hard pressed to see it with the naked eye. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2001 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not to mention that it's a rare shutter that's consistantly accurate to a 1/20 of a stop.
Les |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2144 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2001 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2001-06-16 08:01, Kim wrote:
I would be interested in a discussion of film speed and bellows extension. In general I seem to need about a three stop adjustment to my meter readings from the specified film speed. By this I mean that 3000 asa seems correctly exposed when corrected to a film speed of around 400...now this is for medium
depth focus 8-25 feet.
Does this seem about right?
Kim Hartshorn
|
Pmfji after everyone else has put in his 2 cents. Kim, something is horribly wrong. Your meter is way off or you dialed in the film speed incorrectly. Try comparing its reading with a known good meter. When my old LunaSix went berserk, I confirmed it by comparing with a Nikon that was working well. At the distances/magnifications you're shooting, there's no need to correct for extension and that's not the problem.
Good luck, and keep us posted,
Dan |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|