View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:39 pm Post subject: Shutter Speed Tester/Testing |
|
|
Using this diagram as a guide
http://www.baytan.org/prak/shutter.html
go to Radio Shack and get a
1/8 mono phone plug catalog #274-286
Infrared Photo transistor catalog #276-145
and some hookup wire if you have none.
I no longer use a laser pointer, deep red filter material/lighting control film equivlent to a #25 red filter over the sensor and standard CFL, 2AA MiniMag or similar light source works as well.
Download and install
http://audacity.sourceforge.net/download/
Using the hookup wire (22 gauge speaker wire works well) connect the photo transistor collector C to the center contact on the mono plug. Connect the emitter E to the outside connector of the mono plug. The length of the wire can be as long as needed to comfortably connect to your computers microphone jack and reach the camera/shutter you wish to test.
Using a piece of foam core, cardboard, matt board make a small hole that the photo transistor will just fit into.
Position the photo transistor over the rear of the shutter and centered.
Plug the photo transistor into the computers microphone jack.
Start Audacity then pause-record. In the resulting record window select Waveform db from the audio track drop down options.
Set the shutter to the speed to be tested, position the laser pointer on the front center of the shutter, release pause in audacity, trip the shutter, press stop in audacity.
Using the time expansion and shift tools in audacity measure the time between the point where the base line first goes down to where it starts to go above line. The peaks will flatten out more as the time line expands.
http://www.flutotscamerarepair.com/Shutterspeed.htm _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU.
Last edited by 45PSS on Fri Sep 08, 2017 7:59 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leigh
Joined: 05 Sep 2011 Posts: 6 Location: Maryland, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
An incandescent lamp will work much better than a laser, not being sensitive to direction.
Any photo-transistor will work. It doesn't need to be infrared.
Just some suggestions.
- Leigh |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can you provide a source for those photo transistors that the average Joe can easily get?
They use to be readily available and when I tried to get one from my regular electronic parts supply they were not available.
The adaption post is a result of inquires on other photo forms from members looking for a source and comments from members here about shutter speeds and testing.
At $2 for the Radio Shack transistor and no need for the battery, bias resistor and coupling capacitor this is a very inexpensive option.
The transistor has a response of 650-900 nano meters. A #25 red filter over the transistor with a very bright incandescent light source works also but the narrow beam from the laser pointer makes for a precise on off.
So, please enlighten us. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leigh
Joined: 05 Sep 2011 Posts: 6 Location: Maryland, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mouser has over 300 different phototransistors. The cheapest one with leads being the Lite-On LTR-4206 at $0.14 in singles (1,550 pcs in stock). At 100mW dissipation, 100nA dark current and 10μS response it would seem well-suited to this application.
The Everlight EL-PT204-6B is the same price (7,721 pcs in stock), with 75mW dissipation and other specs similar to the LTR-4206. Sensitivity of both devices is 1mW/cm^2.
These are both infrared detectors, but remember that over 90% of the energy output from a tungsten bulb is in the infrared.
I expect Digi-Key would have a larger selection, but I didn't bother to check. Mouser has no order minimum; Digi-Key does.
I've never bought anything from RS, and never will.
Using a laser source adds an aiming constraint to equipment operation that would be eliminated by using tungsten. On/Off switching times are strictly a matter of the energy impinging on the detector, regardless of its source, and the response time of the detector.
However, rise/fall times are very dependent on load resistance (Rl), with the 10μS value being for a 1,000-ohm load. The Tr/Tf values change almost linearly with increases in Rl, so at Rl = 4,000 ohms the value is about 40μS.
You don't need a red filter in this application. They're used in environments that have lots of fluorescent light impinging on an unshielded detector, which can induce noise and possibly swamp the detector. You don't have that in this case.
If you're concerned, both the Everlight part mentioned above and the Lite-On LTR-4206E part have black epoxy cases that filter out all light above the sensitive wavelengths, at the $0.14 price.
- Leigh
Mouser: www.mouser.com
DigiKey: www.digikey.com _________________ “Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.” - Plato |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When testing the RS infrared transistor it did not respond well to an incandescent light bulb, a 250 Watt Photoflood, or a CFL. It would respond to a 2 AA cell Mini Mag shone through a #25 red filter. The RS IR transmitter output is too weak to use.
I did put a 1.2K (1200 ohm) resistor between the transistor's collector and the center contact of the mic plug but it is not absolutely necessary.
Use rosin core solder only for electrical applications. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
After testing several shutters this simple tester is not accurate above 1/100 second. It does not read the focal plane shutter found in Graflex SLR's correctly.
The response time of the RS transistor is not listed. The response time of most similar transistors at one of the retailers linked above is .010ms rise, .015ms fall.
The view angle is 30° to 40° which is playing a part also. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leigh
Joined: 05 Sep 2011 Posts: 6 Location: Maryland, USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
45PSS wrote: | The response time of the RS transistor is not listed. The response time of most similar transistors at one of the retailers linked above is .010ms rise, .015ms fall. |
Those times are pretty typical.
You'd probably get better performance using photo diodes.
That's what we used in the optical ethernet switch that I helped design.
It works at 1000 Megabits/second, which is faster than most shutters.
- Leigh _________________ “Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.” - Plato |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After picking up another RS photo transistor and a stereo plug, mounting both transistors on a board 1 inch apart, covering with some dark red light gel sheet, lighting with a 60W clear ceiling fan lamp in a work socket, positioned so that the reflex mirror just clears the bulb, I got the same results with both and the same time delay between the start times at all apertures and tensions. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have switched to using the diagram at http://www.kyphoto.com/classics/combinationtester.html .
It was set up for 35mm shutter testing but can be used on any shutter.
I have also purchased photodiodes from Mouser.
The transistor collector(s) or diodes cathode(s) are connected through a resistor to the common lead of a mono or stereo plug. The transistor(s) emitter(s) are connected to the signal lead(s) of the plug. The battery is not needed. The output of the transistor(s) or diode(s) are much higher in this configuration and no special adjustments in the recording program are needed but you may have to lower your microphone input level.
For a leaf shutter you use 1 photo transistor or diode and a mono plug.
I posted a reply to http://photo.net/large-format-photography-forum/0044cW?start=10 detailing this with Radio Shack catalog numbers for the parts and tools needed. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Drew Bedo
Joined: 26 Mar 2012 Posts: 1 Location: Houston TTexas
|
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 4:37 pm Post subject: Does it Work? |
|
|
Hello everyone,
I am new to this issue and not an electronic DIY guy. I have a passing understanding of current, resistance and so on, but don't really understand circuts or how the various components interact.
With all that said: I am interested in the concept of using a light sensor to generate an audio signal and analysing it with a computer. Having read this thread and some of the links: Does it work as a practical matter?m Is there a definative set of directions for the hardware? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peter k
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 207 Location: Sedona Az
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Like the concept... going to put it together, any changes, or anything to add before I do the do? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
willysmb
Joined: 28 Feb 2004 Posts: 128 Location: France _ Europe
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear member
From 2 month ago I bought a Shutter speed tester for my Iphone, because my old system need a serial socket on my Pc and my new pc have not serial socket !!!
So, I'm very happy with my new tester.
http://cgi.ebay.fr/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=251344162964 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peter k
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 207 Location: Sedona Az
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes, a good solution fer ya, but alas, I do not have (gasp) an 'I' phone...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peter k
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 207 Location: Sedona Az
|
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 2:56 am Post subject: Clarification Question? |
|
|
Having printed everything out, and going over it and making a material list, I have a couple of clarification questions ... from...
#1)
Quote: | Graflex ~ Mon Mar 12, 2012: I have also purchased photodiodes from Mouser.
|
and so you made an identical circuit, but used these instead? Because ...
Quote: | PhotoNet Mar 11, 2012: The photodiodes have a faster switching time and produce a square wave output in audacity making reading faster shutter times easier. |
Were talking about two separate testers, with similar circuits, except for the Radio Shack transistor being replaced (from mouser) by the photo diode, correct?
#2)
If using just one RS Transistor, is there a need for an audio cable?
If the audio cable is needed, for 'noise elimination', how is it wired?
You state:
PhotoNet Mar 11, 2012: Quote: | "In the event the schematic link goes bad ..." "... If you are using the audio cable connect the shield to the resistor and one of the colored wires to one transistors emitter and the other colored wire to the other. " |
So please verify.. the other colored wirer to the other emitter, of the second transistor, which were not using, is not connected to anything!
The shield is the connection from the common contact of the plug, to the 4.7k resistor. Using 24 gage speaker wire to go from the 4.7k to the 10k and then on to to C, of the RS transistor, ... correct?
Thanks for the clarification.. going to be a fun project.. looking forward to using it, Thanks for your research, modification and testing of the idea ... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|