View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
centuryuniversal
Joined: 28 Jul 2009 Posts: 12 Location: San Francisco Bay Area
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Billy Canuck
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 165 Location: Calgary AB Canada
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Impressive work! Thank you for posting. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Thoms
Joined: 25 Nov 2009 Posts: 13 Location: San Francisco, CA USA
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice work and a simple solution.
Roger |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm curious how this works out. Despite protestations from my numerous professors, there have been times in my life when the math just doesn't add up. I hope this is the case here.
According to Graflex, Graflex holders keep the film farther away from the back of the camera than graphic holders, so putting a Graphic holder on a Graflex camera SHOULD give you a slightly fuzzy photograph, although I have seen modifications that, by the math, won't work and yet it does. [/u][/b] _________________ "In order to invent, you need a good imagination and a lot of junk" Thomas Edison |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|