View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
primus96
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 225 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 8:06 am Post subject: Negative problem |
|
|
I have been encountering some marks that could be uneven developement or (please God no) a bellows leak.
The marks look like localised extra density. It may be down one or both long edges of the negative. The sheets stand vertically in my Fink-Roselieve tank.
Anybody else using one of these tanks encouter this problem?
Is this due to a agitation problem?
I wondered if I only loaded a max of six sheets, thus keeping a double gap between the sheets it might eliminate the problem.
I am not holding the tank the wrong way. You can tell by the position of the spout & air vent that as you agitate side to side agitation effect moves between the sheets of film. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Uneven developement. Simular as to what happens in a Federal or Yankee tank http://www.adorama.com/DKTY45.html which are simular to yours. More developer movement along the edges than across the rest of the film surface. Corrected by modifying your agation technique. Other experenced users may be able to suggest techniques.
Bellows leaks at the film plane-dense streak from edge toward center of frame in a V shape or simular. Film holder light leaks simular.
Bellows leaks (pin holes)- act like a pin hole camera causing extra images to be superimposed on the main lens image.
Lens board light leaks simular. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clnfrd
Joined: 26 Mar 2002 Posts: 616 Location: Western Kentucky Lakes Area
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
A bellows leak can easily be found by shining a flashlight into the rear of your camera in a dark room. Extra density along the long edges of your negatives could be light leaking along the edges of your film holders if you don't carefully remove and replace the dark slide. Exerting too much outward pressure while pulling the slide along with weak springs on your camera's back can cause this.
I've often cured uneven development problems by using a more dilute developer solution and increasing development times all the while increasing the agitation. Fred. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
primus96
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 225 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 4:14 pm Post subject: Re: Negative problem |
|
|
I reckon this is uneven developement. What is the solution. To agitate more often but in a very gentle fashion.
Would having a full tank make any difference? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Would having a full tank make any difference? |
I assume that you mean the maximun amount of film the tank can handle at one time?
What developer are you using and at what dilution?
What is your current agation interval?
Sure fire soultion is to get a JOBO 2500 series tank and reel(s).
Charles _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
primus96
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 225 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:16 am Post subject: Re: Negative Problem |
|
|
I use R09, the original Rodinal recipie diluted 1:50. I have looked at my stored negatives and found others with this marking.
I usually agitate continuously for the first minute, banging the tank on a folded towel to free trapped air bubbles. Therafter 15secs every minute, in one single period of agitation.
If this is a common problem for users of this type of tank: What did you do to avoid or reduce the chances of it occuring? Ought I to agitate very gently, at say the top & bottom of each minute. By gentle agitation I mean a single side-to-side rocking motion.
My last lot of negatives came out well and they had not been agitated so strongly.
Is the problem likely tobe from the developer moving about too much?
I can always do a full load of twelve sheets and apply a gentler agitation technique if that is what is successful for you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I switched to the JoBo tanks as I never reall got the agation technique worked out because I got tird of the chemicals sloshing out of the vent, pour spout, and from around the edge of the lid reguardless of how I held and tried to seal them.
Others have posted simular types of conserns both here and on Photo.Net.
You may have to experiment with agation technique until you get consistent results. I think the gentler approach is good and every 30 seconds for 5 to 10 seconds may be in order also. You may want to go in a somewhat eliptical pattern instead of just back and forth in the direction of the film.
I just did a search for "yankee" and got several posts for daylight developement including this one:
http://www.graflex.org/helpboard/viewtopic.php?t=889&highlight=yankee
Charles _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sobahguy
Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Posts: 173 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
45PSS wrote: | Quote: | Would having a full tank make any difference? | Sure fire soultion is to get a JOBO 2500 series tank and reel(s).
Charles |
Hi Charles, can you post a link to the JOBO 2500 series tank & reel from either Adorama or B&H so that I could see what I should be looking for? I'm pretty much near the breaking point myself trying get good results from the Fink/Roslieve (F-R) daylight tank I've been using.
Thanks, Sobah!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
primus96
Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Posts: 225 Location: Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 6:25 pm Post subject: Re: Negative Problem |
|
|
The thread reccomended suggests that if you hold a Fink-Roselieve tank with the filler at 5 o clock & the spout at 11 as I do usually. They suggest agitate by a movement away from and back to my body NOT side to side like I have been doing.
I do have some sheets for developement. They are of the ancient Ansco Isopan and modern Maco Print Film. I will amend my technique accordingly and let you know of my results. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jim23
Joined: 08 Sep 2001 Posts: 129 Location: US/Greater Cincinnati, Ohio
|
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 1:30 am Post subject: Tanks! |
|
|
I have tried the F-R and Yankee cut film tanks over and over without consistent success. I have complete success with 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 or 4 x 5 with open hard-rubber tanks and good old stainless hangers following the lift-tilt agitation method described in many textbooks. I use the 1/2 gallon tanks with HC110B or D76, stop, and fix and do all the work with the lights out, no more than six sheets at a time.
Somewhere in these posts - someone indicated complete success with a Yankee tank - I will try it one more time.....I sure would like to do more than 6 sheets at once. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Somewhere in these posts - someone indicated complete success with a Yankee tank - I will try it one more time.....I sure would like to do more than 6 sheets at once. |
A JOBO 2521 with the 2560 extension and 3 2509n reels would allow you to process up to 18 sheets at a time.
The 2551 or 2561 will handle 2 2509n reels giving 12 sheet capicaty and adding the 2560 extension and 2 additional 2509n reels will do 24 sheets at one time.
A roller base or motor base would be useful or one could just roll it back and forth on a counter if there is enough room. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|