View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Marc Morel
Joined: 18 Dec 2005 Posts: 5 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello everyone!
I have a beautiful little Aluminium 1940's Rilex Press Camera, Made by Riley Research Corp in Santa Monica - it's a 2 1/4 x 3 1/4" format camera with a rotating back and Raptar 101mm lens... and that's ALL I know about it!! Does anyone out there know anything else about these cameras or their Manufacturer? Google has helped naught and I am extremely curious! It's a lovely camera to use!
Cheers, Marc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clnfrd
Joined: 26 Mar 2002 Posts: 616 Location: Western Kentucky Lakes Area
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Marc Morel
Joined: 18 Dec 2005 Posts: 5 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the investigating! That's all I'd found too - my one is a model "a", which looks pretty much the same, except there are just holes where the rangefinder used to be! It's such a gem, I can't believe info is so scarce on these!
Any further leads most welcome!
Marc! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
glennfromwy
Joined: 29 Nov 2001 Posts: 903 Location: S.W. Wyoming
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sadly, there are several of these type cameras with little or no information. I have a Rex Labs press type camera that is a total mystery. One reason for this is that after WWII ended, the many small firms who had been making things for the military suddenly had nothing to do. Quite a few went into the camera making business. Most, of course were failures and left a legacy of the unknown.
_________________ Glenn
"Wyoming - Where everybody is somebody else's weirdo" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
t.r.sanford
Joined: 10 Nov 2003 Posts: 812 Location: East Coast (Long Island)
|
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The "Rilex" is, at least, sketchily documented in McKeown's and the "Blue Book Illustrated Price Guide" (1982). It seems to be fondly remembered; the elderly woman who ran Jay's A-Chromoptics in Chicago three decades ago thought highly of it. I saw a used one in a New York City shop window around 1962, and almost bought it; it looks like a snazzy little camera.
McKeown's cryptically reports that the first body design was modified very soon after production began, to accommodate a Kalart rangefinder. It then reports that "Rilex" bodies are by convention identified as "A," "B" and "AB" styles -- but does not say how to tell one from the other.
The website referenced above states that the specimen pictured has a 103mm. f:4.5 lens, of which I've never heard. McKeown's reports that the standard lens equipment was either a "Tessar" or a Wollensak "Velostigmat" f:4.5 (focal length unspecified), while the "Blue Book" says that the camera was supplied with a 127mm. Kodak "Anastigmat Special" (which I take to be a pre-"Ektar"). All are plausible choices, but it's surprising that three sources mention four different lenses... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Marc Morel
Joined: 18 Dec 2005 Posts: 5 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK, to hopefully encourage the collation of some information on this obscure little machine, I've made a webpage:
http://www.rumspringe.org.au/~marc/rilex.htm
ALL contributions on the subject welcomed!
Cheers, Marc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bartsf
Joined: 10 Nov 2005 Posts: 9 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the Rilex is mentionedin one of Jason Schneider's The Camera Collector columns that appeared in Modern Photography and is reprinted as chapter 37 in his Jason Schneider on Camera Collecting V1, published in 1978.
The article is sub-titled "Classic camera buys of the year - a pair of sheet film enigmas, plus the world's best leather polish."
The Rilex he mentions as a mystery camera on sale at Olden Camera in NYC @ $125 had a 101mm f4.5 Ektar in a Kodak Supermatic flash shutter and the camera had a serial number of 787.
Bart Nadeau |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dsadowski
Joined: 11 Dec 2009 Posts: 2 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A magazine blurb from the late 1940s about the Rilex says it was supplied without lens, so perhaps those were added by the dealer, explaining why there is such a variety of lenses found with the cameras today. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Henry
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 1644 Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That link is "error 404--not found." Try again? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
graphicdave
Joined: 29 May 2007 Posts: 67 Location: Maryland
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Henry,
clnfrd's post was from December 2005.....most likely dead now  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Riley Research Co., Santa Monica, Ca.
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Riley
Camerapedia - Riley _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|