View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Captwbrd
Joined: 25 Jul 2001 Posts: 2 Location: Pacific Northwest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2001 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
The camera I purchased came with two lenses.
The first was a Kodak Ectar ES1698. That makes sense -- according to you site a 1947 lense.
I also have a Kodak Anastigmat F7.7 152mm #92091. It has ILEX on the outer black forward facing ring. After reading all the information and the article that is available -- this lense does not match anything.
Is there any information or a website that will give me reference to the above number.
Thanks,
Kim
[ This Message was edited by: Captwbrd on 2001-07-25 18:00 ] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2001 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
A couple of things come to mind. This may be a pre war lens. Many of the Kodak Anastigmats became "ektars" in the 40s with the advent of coating.
It may also be a post war lens was licensed to Ilex by Kodak and therefore took the older name. Here's a little history to confuse you.
Back in '03 Zeiss designed a lens and named it the Tessar. That name was copyrighted and only offical licensees could use the name. Bausch & Lomb were the US liscensees, but they also made the same lens for Kodak Under the Kodak label it was named Anastigmat since the Kodak was a sub-licensee.
This may have happened with this Kodak/ Ilex lens. Kodak wasn't going to give Ilex the Ektar name so they went with a public domain name.
The last possiblily is that it's a Kodak lens in an Ilex shutter?
_________________ "In order to invent, you need a good imagination and a lot of junk" Thomas Edison |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captwbrd
Joined: 25 Jul 2001 Posts: 2 Location: Pacific Northwest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2001 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay you got me thinking. I took apart the assembly and got out my magnifying glass. Turns out it is a Kodak uncoated lense in a Ilex shutter. I asume that would make it a prewar unit. Just had not run into that combination before. Thanks for your help.
Kim |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2001 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't either, it's probable that the compur or compound may have expired along the way and the ilex was handy.
_________________ "In order to invent, you need a good imagination and a lot of junk" Thomas Edison |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|