View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Padeye
Joined: 30 Jan 2002 Posts: 21 Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2002 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm new to large format and will be starting with a crown graphic. I do a fair amount of portraiture and was wondering if the same focal length guidelines for 35mm apply to large format. I've always used a lens of at least twice the frame diagonal (when cropped to 4:5 ratio) to avoid exaggerated perspective. If I apply that rule to 4x5 I get a very long lens, probably even too long to focus at infinity let alone close.
I know different rules apply here because of different magnification ratios between large and small format. I'll be closer to a macro extension than infinity for a face shot. So bottom-line it for me. What should my minimum focal length be for face shots with 4x5? Is it even practical to do that with a Crown or should I look for alternatives like a 6x7 back and 180mm lens or wait until I get a long bellows camera?
_________________ Steve Padilla |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2002 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I usually use a rule of double the longer of the two dimentions. This gives us about a 10" lens on a 4x5 and Wollensak made a 10" tele-optar that would be good for portraiture. A 12" tele lens would be good too, they made a 15" tele for the Graflex and Graphic, but you would need a pretty long studio for that, and have a couple of 8x10 portrait lenses that are 15" in focal lenght, so maybe it's a bit too long.
The 10"tele lens is preferable over a "normal designed 10" in your situation because a tele lens uses less bellows draw than a normal, so you will be able to focus closer with a tele than with a normal 10" lens.
another lens option would be the 270mm tele-artar and tele rotelar.
except for the 10" tele-optar, these lenses will be on the heavy side, the tele-optar just a bit less so. While it can be done with a graphic, it won't be the sturdiest of cameras for the situation, particularly since you'll have to mount the camera on a tripod in the vertical postion. A kodak 2D or agfa/ansco with a 4x5 back or a Crown View camera would all be sturdier, but bigger and heavier. A Crown View looks just like a 2D but it 4x5. Even a grpahic view would be sturdier than a graphic, but again you trade sturdiness for portability. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hartwell_a_m
Joined: 04 Jun 2001 Posts: 84 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2002 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have found that a 150mm-180mm lens is fine for 1/2 -3/4 lenth portraits, though for head and sholder work a 270mm lens is better.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|